On September 11, 2001, the world witnessed a tragic event that changed the course of history forever. The collapse of the World Trade Center’s twin towers shook the nation, but another building, known as Building Seven, also succumbed to destruction.
Let’s explore the top comments from viewers of one of the main 9/11 video(s) on YouTube, which captures the collapse of WTC Building Seven, shedding light on the various perspectives and theories surrounding this significant event.
Here’s a table summarizing the insights from the comments on the video showing the collapse of WTC 7:
|Lack of Awareness||Many viewers are unaware of Building Seven and its collapse, despite their familiarity with the twin towers.|
|Controversial Debate||The controlled demolition theory sparks a heated debate among commenters.|
|Suspicion and Rethinking||Some viewers express skepticism about the official explanation and call for reevaluating building safety.|
|Firefighters’ Testimonies||Commenters reference videos of firefighters discussing explosions, suggesting additional evidence exists.|
|Fishy Happenings||The collapse of Building Seven raises suspicions and leads some to question the events of September 11.|
|Questioning Official Narrative||A physics teacher’s comment highlights skepticism about the official explanation for the tower collapses.|
|Suspicious Circumstances||Commenters raise concerns about the timing and access to the buildings, suggesting potential foul play.|
|Controlled Demolition||Removal of YouTube content and mention of “countdown” adds weight to the theory of a controlled demolition.|
|Perfectly Executed Demolition||One viewer praises the precision of the building’s collapse, hinting at a controlled demolition.|
|Skepticism of Fire Damage||Commenters question the extent of fire damage as a plausible explanation for the building’s collapse.|
This table summarizes the key insights and perspectives shared by the commenters in relation to the collapse of Building Seven and the events of September 11, 2001.
Comment: “Everyone flies their flags and wears all their patriot gear, but when you mention Building 7, nobody knows a single thing about it.”
Comment: “The fact that there is even a debate on whether this was a controlled demolition or not is mind-boggling/reality breakdown.”
Comment: “Thanks NIST for your awesome and professional job on the explanation of why this building collapsed nearly at free fall speed. Now we need to reconstruct and rethink probably a couple thousand buildings around the world since a fire could lead to a catastrophic event like this.”
Comment: “Remember when you could find the video of the firefighters talking about the explosions? Yeah, good times.”
Comment: “This is the single most prominent evidence of something really fishy happening that day.”
Comment: “I remember my high school physics teacher bringing this up one day; he told us flat out it wasn’t physically possible for the towers to collapse as they did from a plane crash.”
Comment: “During the months leading up to 9/11, there were many vacant floors undergoing ‘renovations.’ The elevators were also going through upgrades which took months to complete, and allowed hundreds of tradesmen, laden with tonnes of parts and equipment, free access into both buildings… There was more than enough time & opportunity to completely wire both buildings for a controlled explosion.”
Comment: “The fact that YT is removing anything that questions the official report on WTC 7, such as firefighter testimonies which were filmed during the event discussing the ‘countdown’ of the demolition charges… should tell you everything you need to know. Honestly.”
Comment: “That was the most perfectly executed controlled demolition I’ve ever seen.”
Comment: “For an office building to free fall like building 7 did on 9/11, you would have to remove all the welds that hold the girders together. The only way a building could collapse into its own footprint like building 7 is that it would have to have been done by a controlled demolition.”
The comments surrounding the collapse of Building Seven provide a glimpse into the wide range of opinions and theories held by viewers of the video. Some express frustration with the lack of public awareness regarding Building Seven, highlighting a perceived disconnect between the iconic imagery of patriotism and the general ignorance surrounding this particular event. The debate over whether the collapse was a result of a controlled demolition or not is a subject of controversy, with some finding it perplexing that there is any debate at all.
There are comments expressing suspicion and reevaluation of the official explanation provided by organizations like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Concerns are raised about the potential implications for other buildings worldwide and the need to reassess safety measures and structural designs. References to testimonies from firefighters describing explosions and other fishy happenings further fuel skepticism and doubts about the official narrative.
Certain commenters question the physical feasibility of the collapse, drawing upon their knowledge of physics and the structural integrity of the buildings. They express skepticism about the towers’ collapse from a plane crash alone and suggest that a controlled demolition might have been involved.
Suspicions are raised about the circumstances leading up to 9/11, such as vacant floors and elevator upgrades, which some commenters believe could have provided an opportunity to wire the buildings for controlled explosions. This adds to the skepticism surrounding the events of that day.
The removal of content that questions the official report on Building Seven, including firefighter testimonies discussing the demolition charges, is seen by some as further evidence of a cover-up or a deliberate effort to control the narrative.
Lastly, there are comments acknowledging the apparent precision and execution of the collapse, suggesting that if it was indeed a controlled demolition, it was carried out with exceptional skill.
Here’s another table summarizing the insights from the comments on the collapse of Building Seven:
|Lack of Awareness||Commenters express frustration with the lack of public awareness regarding Building Seven.|
|Controversial Debate||The debate over whether the collapse was a controlled demolition sparks controversy among commenters.|
|Suspicion and Reevaluation||Commenters express skepticism and call for a reevaluation of the official explanation provided by organizations like NIST.|
|Firefighters’ Testimonies||References to firefighter testimonies describing explosions and other fishy happenings raise doubts about the official narrative.|
|Questioning Physical Feasibility||Commenters question the physical feasibility of the collapse and express skepticism about the official explanation.|
|Suspicious Circumstances||Concerns are raised about the circumstances leading up to 9/11, such as vacant floors and elevator upgrades.|
|Removal of Questioning Content||Commenters highlight the removal of content questioning the official report, suggesting a deliberate effort to control the narrative.|
|Acknowledging Execution||Some commenters acknowledge the apparent precision and execution of the collapse, if it was indeed a controlled demolition.|
The top comments on the video capturing the collapse of Building Seven reflect a spectrum of perspectives and theories surrounding the event. These comments underscore the ongoing discussions and debates regarding the events of September 11, 2001, and the various explanations put forth to account for the collapse of Building Seven.
— Sources & Relevant PDFs:
A Structural Reevaluation of the Collapse of World Trade Center 7
NIST Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (Full PDF)